Abstract
Background
There is growing awareness of the need for more cautious, conservative prescribing. One conservative prescribing principle urges prescribers, whenever possible, to start only one new medication at a time. Little is known about how often primary care physicians (PCPs) start multiple medications at the same time, and when that is needed.
Objective
To describe how frequently PCPs start multiple prescriptions at the same time, evaluate evidence supporting the necessity of initiating multiple prescriptions concurrently, and describe PCP and clinical sites’ prescribing variability.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Participants
PCPs at four sites who wrote prescriptions during January 2017–December 2018.
Main Measures
Frequency of initiating two or more new prescriptions during the same session.
Key Results
Across the four sites, 4646 PCPs wrote 7,849,914 new prescriptions. The Veterans Administration (VA) site had the highest percentage of encounters with multiple concurrent new drug starts (27.2%), followed by Northwestern (NW) (19.7%), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) (16.1%), and University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) (14.0%). Within each site, there was wide variation among PCPs in percentage of encounters where they prescribed multiple new medications. Interquartile range varied: 11.0–18.5% (BWH), 15.1–22% (NW), 11.0–15.8% (UIC), and 22.9–31.0% (VA). Reviewing the most frequent combinations, only 0.6% had strong evidence for starting them concurrently. Most were drugs either recommended to be taken together (16.8%) or reasonable to be taken together, but with no evidence supporting starting them simultaneously (71.5%). A smaller percentage of concurrent starts were potentially problematic (10.4%) or contraindicated (0.7%) due to overlapping side effects or drug-drug interactions.
Conclusions
PCPs frequently started multiple medications concurrently, often without compelling evidence, with notable variations across prescribers and institutions. Although we could not conduct detailed chart review for each encounter, classification of the most frequent drug pairs concurrently prescribed in our study suggests opportunities to potentially improve prescribing safety.
Topic
JGIM
Author Descriptions
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
Tewodros Eguale MD, PhD, Aneesha Fathima Syed Mohamed PharmD, PhD & Renuka Kandikatla PhD
Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA
Tewodros Eguale MD, PhD, Maria Mirica PhD, Alejandra Salazar PharmD, Lynn A. Volk MHS & Gordon D. Schiff MD
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
John Shilka PharmD & William Galanter MD, PhD
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
John Cashy PhD, Walid Gellad MD & Jennifer Hale BA
Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Bruce L. Lambert PhD
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
Adam Wright PhD
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
Jeffrey A. Linder MD
Harvard Medical School Center for Primary Care, Boston, MA, USA
Gordon D. Schiff MD
Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Brigham and Women’S Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Gordon D. Schiff MD
Share
Related Articles
Clinical Utility of Routine Monoclonal Gammopathy Testing in the Evaluation of Peripheral Neuropathy
Abstract Background Peripheral neuropathy can be associated with certain monoclonal gammopathies; therefore,…
Direct and Indirect Pathways Between Food Insecurity and Glycemic Control in Adults with Diabetes
Abstract Background Extensive research identifies food insecurity as a driver of poor…