Abstract

Introduction

Food insecurity (FI) affects 13.8% of the USA, disproportionately afflicts low-income and minority populations, and is associated with increased risks of chronic health conditions. Produce prescription (PRx) programs, a Food Is Medicine intervention, have emerged as a promising way to address FI and improve the health of participants with limited access to healthy foods and chronic metabolic conditions, yet PRx implementation in practice remains poorly understood.

Methods

We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework to inform semi-structured interviews with 15 participants enrolled in a 12-month PRx intervention that provided weekly produce deliveries, personalized nutrition coaching, and community-based education sessions to alleviate food insecurity and support dietary behavior change. Interviews explored the intervention’s implementation and impacts. We analyzed interview data using a reflexive thematic analysis approach.

Setting

Academic health system in North Carolina.

Results

Participants expressed a variety of motivations for participation (reach). Improved dietary knowledge, community engagement, improvements in health, and motivations to prioritize self-care were viewed as benefits of participation (effectiveness). Engagement was facilitated by social connection as well as the financial benefit and consistency of receiving weekly produce boxes. Barriers to full engagement in PRx (implementation) included logistical, transportation, and financial constraints. Participants expressed a strong commitment to maintaining healthy eating habits, but many were unsure how they would do so because of systemic barriers to healthy food (maintenance).

Conclusions

Our study generated novel evidence regarding PRx implementation. We found that PRx implementation was limited by logistical and financial constraints and facilitated by consistent produce access, relationships with the staff and fellow peers, and community-based education. Our findings suggest that flexible produce delivery options, individual-level dietary counseling, and community-located educational sessions enhanced PRx implementation. Future studies should examine strategies to support engagement and sustained behavior change and evaluate mechanisms for stable program implementation.

Topic

JGIM

Author Descriptions

Department of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 529 Vine Street, 4th Floor, Winston Salem, NC , 27101, USA
Rachel Zimmer DNP, APRN, Sarah A. Birken PhD & Roger Vilardaga PhD

Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 529 Vine Street, 4th floor, Winston Salem, NC, 27101, USA
Ashley Strahley MPH, Lindsey Abdelfattah MS & Amresh Hanchate PhD

YMCA of Northwest NC, Winston Lake Family YMCA/REACH Center, Winston Salem, 901 Waterworks Rd, NC , 27101, USA
Diane Shenberger MS, RDN, LDN

Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Downtown Health Plaza, 1200 N Martin Luther King Jr Dr, Winston-Salem, NC , 27101, USA
Deepak Palakshappa MD, MSHP

Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Downtown Health Plaza, 1200 N Martin Luther King Jr Dr, Winston-Salem, NC , 27101, USA
Deepak Palakshappa MD, MSHP

Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, USA, Ground Floor, Administration Suite, NC, 27157
Charlotte Crotts CCRC

Share