Abstract
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are increasingly used to target patients with elevated mortality risk scores for goals-of-care (GOC) conversations.
Objective
To evaluate the association between the presence or absence of AI-generated mortality risk scores with GOC documentation.
Design
Retrospective cross-sectional study at one large academic medical center between July 2021 and December 2022.
Participants
Hospitalized adult patients with AI-defined Serious Illness Risk Indicator (SIRI) scores indicating > 30% 90-day mortality risk (defined as “elevated” SIRI) or no SIRI scores due to insufficient data.
Intervention
A targeted intervention to increase GOC documentation for patients with AI-generated scores predicting elevated risk of mortality.
Main Measures
Odds ratios comparing GOC documentation for patients with elevated or no SIRI scores with similar severity of illness using propensity score matching and risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression.
Key Results
Among 13,710 patients with elevated (n = 3643, 27%) or no (n = 10,067, 73%) SIRI scores, the median age was 64 years (SD 18). Twenty-five percent were non-White, 18% had Medicaid, 43% were admitted to an intensive care unit, and 11% died during admission. Patients lacking SIRI scores were more likely to be younger (median 60 vs. 72 years, p < 0.0001), be non-White (29% vs. 13%, p < 0.0001), and have Medicaid (22% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001). Patients with elevated versus no SIRI scores were more likely to have GOC documentation in the unmatched (aOR 2.5, p < 0.0001) and propensity-matched cohorts (aOR 2.1, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Using AI predictions of mortality to target GOC documentation may create differences in documentation prevalence between patients with and without AI mortality prediction scores with similar severity of illness. These finding suggest using AI to target GOC documentation may have the unintended consequence of disadvantaging severely ill patients lacking AI-generated scores from receiving targeted GOC documentation, including patients who are more likely to be non-White and have Medicaid insurance.
Topic
JGIM
Author Descriptions
Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Gina M. Piscitello MD, MS, Jane Schell MD, MHS & Yael Schenker MD, MAS
Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Gina M. Piscitello MD, MS, Jane Schell MD, MHS & Yael Schenker MD, MAS
Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Shari Rogal MD, MPH
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Shari Rogal MD, MPH
Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Robert M. Arnold MD
Share
Related Articles
Effective Clinical Externships for International Medical Students: A Qualitative Study
Abstract Background International student exchanges are a significant part of medical education,…
Use of the Patient Portal to Discuss Medications Among People with Dementia and Their Care Partners
Abstract Background People with dementia (PWD) often use potentially inappropriate medications (PIM),…