Abstract
Background
Population health programs rely on healthcare predictive models to allocate resources, yet models can perpetuate biases that exacerbate health disparities among marginalized communities.
Objective
We developed the Bias-reduction and Equity Framework for Assessing, Implementing, and Redesigning (BE-FAIR) healthcare predictive models, an applied framework tested within a large health system using a population health predictive model, aiming to minimize bias and enhance equity.
Design
Retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Data collected from September 30, 2020, to October 1, 2022, were analyzed to assess bias resulting from model use.
Participants
Primary care or payer-attributed patients at the medical center identified through electronic health records and claims data. Participants were stratified by race-ethnicity, gender, and social vulnerability defined by the Healthy Places Index (HPI).
Intervention
BE-FAIR implementation involved steps such as an anti-racism lens application, de-siloed team structure, historical intervention review, disaggregated data analysis, and calibration evaluation.
Main Measures
The primary outcome was the calibration and discrimination of the model across different demographic groups, measured by logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results
The study population consisted of 114,311 individuals with a mean age of 43.4 years (SD 24.0 years), 55.4% female, and 59.5% white/Caucasian. Calibration differed by race-ethnicity and HPI with significantly lower predicted probabilities of hospitalization for African Americans (0.129±0.051, p=0.016), Hispanics (0.133±0.047, p=0.004), AAPI (0.120±0.051, p=0.018), and multi-race (0.245±0.087, p=0.005) relative to white/Caucasians and for individuals in low HPI areas (0 – 25%, 0.178±0.042, p<0.001; 25 – 50%, 0.129±0.044, p=0.003). AUROC values varied among demographic groups.
Conclusions
The BE-FAIR framework offers a practical approach to address bias in healthcare predictive models, guiding model development, and implementation. By identifying and mitigating biases, BE-FAIR enhances the fairness and equity of healthcare delivery, particularly for minoritized groups, paving the way for more inclusive and effective population health strategies.
Topic
JGIM
Author Descriptions
Office of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California (UC) Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
Reshma Gupta MD, MSHPM, Mayu Sasaki MPH & Matthew Crase BA
Department of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA
Reshma Gupta MD, MSHPM & Jason Y. Adams MD, MS
Department of Public Health Sciences, UC Davis, Davis, USA
Sandra L. Taylor PhD & Sili Fan MS
Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA
Jeffrey S. Hoch PhD, Yi Zhang PhD, MS & Dan Tancredi PhD
Department of Pediatrics, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA
Dan Tancredi PhD
IT Data Center of Excellence, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA
Jason Y. Adams MD, MS
Center for Health Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA
Hendry Ton MD, MS
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA
Hendry Ton MD, MS
Division of Health Policy and Management, UC Davis, Davis, USA
Jeffrey S. Hoch PhD
Share
Related Articles
Screening and Referral for Social Needs Among Veterans: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract Background Healthcare-based social need screening and referral (S&R) among adult populations…
Theoretical considerations of the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator Assessment Framework
Abstract Issue The Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator assessment framework provides a concise approach to observing…